Equine Business and Tax Guest Speaker: Larry Rosenblum

Larry Rosenblum, President of The Equine Tax Group, spoke to Alfred University students on select topics in Equine Business and Taxation.

Larry Rosenblum

In the morning session, Larry’s presentation enabled the audience to understand the importance of having a business plan for business and tax purposes in farming or related agricultural businesses.   The presentation walked the audience through each step of the process.

In the evening session Larry focused on select equine tax and tax audit issues.

Larry’s firm partners with taxpayers, C.P.A. firms, and Attorneys to resolve disputes with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and State Tax Departments, with a special focus on resolving section 183 (hobby loss) and section 469 (passive loss) issues in the equine industry.

Larry’s practice also includes IRS dispute resolution and general taxation issues, and Agriculture and Excise taxes. He possesses expertise in IRS Examination, Collection and Appeals procedures, and is an experienced witness in court cases and income reconstruction cases.

§174 R&D Expense Deductions and §41 Tax Credits: Useful Start-up Tax Tools

Research and development (“R&D”) expenses are generally capitalized; however, taxpayers may elect to currently deduct these expenses under §174 in the tax year in which paid or incurred, or amortize them over a period of not less than 60 months. Taxpayers may also elect to claim a nonrefundable tax credit under §41 for certain qualified research expenses paid incurred for qualified research. Taxpayers may claim either the deduction or the credit for a particular expense but not both, where unused credits can be carried back one tax year, and then forward 20 years under §39.

Section 41 generally defines qualified research expenses as:

  • Supplies
  • Contract research (payments to third party businesses)
  • Basic research payments[(payments non-profits and institutions)
  • Wages for in-house R&D activities (usually the majority of expenses eligible for the credit). This expense only qualifies if paid to an employees:
    1. engaging in qualified research
    2. directly supervising qualified research
    3. supporting qualified research

Subject to certain exclusions, §41 generally defines qualified research broadly:

  • The activity must be to create new (or improve existing) functionality, performance, reliability, or quality of any taxpayer product, process, technique, invention, formula, etc. (a “Business Component”) used in the taxpayer’s trade or business.
  • The intent must be to discover information eliminating uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of the Business Component.
  • The process must be systematic process, generally using any method from the conventional scientific method to something as informal as trial and error process.
  • The process must fundamentally rely on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science.

The tax credit amount is calculated by using one of three methods:

  • Traditional Credit Calculation – 20% of qualified research expenses exceeding a base amount
  • Start-Up Credit Calculation – 20% of qualified research expenses exceeding a base amount
  • Alternative Simplified Credit – 14% of qualified research expenses exceeding a base amount

Where, the base amount is the product of a fixed-base percentage and the taxpayer’s average annual gross receipts for the prior four tax years, provided that the base amount can never be below 50% of the current year’s qualified research expenses.

Note that effective for tax year 2016, qualified small businesses may use up to $250,000 of their research tax credits to offset a portion of their payroll taxes.

§168(k): Bonus Depreciation is Another Important Cost Recovery Tool

Bonus depreciation under §168(k) provides that the taxpayer may deduct 50% of the cost of qualifying new assets put into service in taxable years from 2015 to 2017, phasing down to 40% in 2018 and 30% in 2019.

This means that an unraced, untrained Thoroughbred yearling is eligible for bonus depreciation because a buyer will be placing the horse in service for the first time. It’s a “new” horse for bonus depreciation purposes. However, a Thoroughbred sold as a 2-year-old in training probably is not, nor is a mare in foal.

Note that changing how the horse is used, buying a show hunter as a broodmare for example, does not constitute a new “original use” for bonus depreciation purposes.

To summarize, the tax rules provide that a horse business with “used” qualifying property may:

  1. First take a 179 expense, if any
  2. Then take MACRS expense

However, a horse business with “new” qualifying property may:

  1. First take 179 expense, if any
  2. Then take 168(k) bonus depreciation
  3. And then take MACRS expense

Importantly, if §179 does not apply because of certain limit triggers then bonus depreciation and MACRS still apply.

So you can see that by taking §179, and bonus depreciation, and MACRS, those taxpayers with qualifying property have significant cost recovery tools.

§179: Accelerating Cost Recovery for Horse Businesses

Section 179 is a very business friendly tax provision meant to give small to medium-sized businesses the tax incentive to purchase qualified property. When combined with §168 MACRS deduction, and §168(k) Bonus Depreciation (to be discussed in a later post), those in the horse business can usually recover a significant amount of their depreciable costs immediately.

Although a generous tax provision, §179 is subject to three limitations:

  1. Type of property – qualified property must generally be new and used tangible property, but also may include computer software and real property, as specified in §1245(a)(3). Horses qualify.
  2. Dollar limitation – the maximum expense allowable starting in tax year 2016 is $500,000, and is reduced dollar-for-dollar over $2,000,000 of the aggregate costs of those qualified properties placed in service in the same taxable year. Both amounts will be indexed to inflation.
  3. Income limitation – bars a taxpayer from expensing an amount greater than their taxable income (including wages and salaries) from the active conduct of all their trades or businesses. Section 179 may not by itself create or increase a loss, and any excess not used in that taxable because of the income limitation may be carried over to the next taxable year.

Section 179 is also useful because it provides taxpayers with significant planning opportunities:

  • The taxpayer can allocate their deduction amounts among their qualified property, meaning that they may want to consider applying their section §179 amounts first to those qualified properties that depreciate slower than others.
  • Applying §179 to an asset may impact whether the half-year or mid-quarter convention applies to those assets placed in service in a taxable year.

Note that §179 property is subject to the recapture rules so that any prior §179 expense may have to be recaptured as ordinary income if the asset is later sold.

§§ 167 and 168: Depreciation is a Friend to Those in the Horse Business

Depreciation under §§ 167 and 168 is an important way in which horse businesses recover their costs. Horses are tangible assets and can be depreciated unless they are inventory, meaning if your business is buying and selling horses and not breeding or racing them then they are inventory and thus not depreciable.

Depreciating a tangible asset requires answering two questions:

  • When can I take a depreciation deduction?

You generally start depreciating in the taxable year in which you engage in a trade or business, and your asset is “placed in service.” The placed-in-service date is the date the depreciable property is ready and available for a specific use, even if not actually used yet. Purchasing the asset is not enough, and if it was held for personal use and then converted to business use then the property becomes depreciable on the conversion date.

Generally, a racing or a show horse is placed in service the earlier of when their training begins, or when they start racing or are shown.  And if previously placed in service, then they may be depreciated when purchased from the prior owner. For broodmares depreciation begins when the mare is first brought to the farm to be bred, and if already in foal then when purchased. A breeding stallion is placed in service when its services are first offered.

  • How much can I take as a depreciation deduction?

Answering this question is a function of the following four elements:

The cost basis under §1012, and any adjustments under §1016. For example, a horse’s cost basis is increased by adding the cost of a trip to acquire it.  Rul. 72-113, 1972-1 C.B. 99.

The depreciation method, as in the 150% declining balance Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS), for example.

The asset’s useful life, where horses generally fall into the three or seven year class, depending upon its age and use when placed into service. Yearlings, racehorses and breeding horses over 12 are depreciated as three-year property; all others are depreciated as seven-year property.

The depreciation convention, where generally the half-year convention is used unless the 40% rule is triggered under §168(d)(3) which requires the mid-quarter convention. The key is to determine in which quarter of the taxable year the asset is placed “in service.”

Note that selling depreciated property for a gain may result in recapturing some of the previously depreciated amounts as ordinary income.

§162: Deducting Equine Expenses

If your horse activity rises to the level of being a trade or business, and more than just a hobby (see §183), then congratulations! Subject to the passive loss limitation rules of §469, you are now entitled to recover some of those costs as §162 Trade or Business Expenses where expenses are generally deductible without limitation when they are paid or incurred:

  1. In carrying on any trade or business;
  2. Are ordinary and necessary, and,
  3. Are reasonable in amount.

“Ordinary” refers to those expenses that are common in your industry, and “necessary” does not mean absolutely necessary but instead means the expense is helpful to create income. The key here is that your business expenses should be similar to those in your industry and in line with similar budgets, where the amount expensed bears a reasonable relation to the benefit expected. It does not mean that you have to be a carbon copy of another business; however, you should be prepared to explain yourself to the tax authorities if asked.

Note that when taxpayers establish that they have incurred deductible business expenses but are unable to substantiate the exact amounts, the tax court can estimate the deductible amount in some circumstances, but only if the taxpayers present sufficient evidence to establish a rational basis for making the estimate. Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1930).